Два метода:
import random, math
def randStr_1(chars:str, length:int) -> str:
chars *= math.ceil(length / len(chars))
chars = letters[0:length]
chars = list(chars)
random.shuffle(characters)
return ''.join(chars)
def randStr_2(chars:str, length:int) -> str:
return ''.join(random.choice(chars) for i in range(chars))
1010 *
*
Тест:
from timeit import timeit
setup = """
import os, subprocess, time, string, random, math
def randStr_1(letters:str, length:int) -> str:
letters *= math.ceil(length / len(letters))
letters = letters[0:length]
letters = list(letters)
random.shuffle(letters)
return ''.join(letters)
def randStr_2(letters:str, length:int) -> str:
return ''.join(random.choice(letters) for i in range(length))
"""
print('Method 1 vs Method 2', ', run 10 times each.')
for length in [100,1000,10000,50000,100000,500000,1000000]:
print(length, 'characters:')
eff1 = timeit("randStr_1(string.ascii_letters, {})".format(length), setup=setup, number=10)
eff2 = timeit("randStr_2(string.ascii_letters, {})".format(length), setup=setup, number=10)
print('\t{}s : {}s'.format(round(eff1, 6), round(eff2, 6)))
print('\tratio = {} : {}\n'.format(eff1/eff1, round(eff2/eff1, 2)))
Выход:
Method 1 vs Method 2 , run 10 times each.
100 characters:
0.001411s : 0.00179s
ratio = 1.0 : 1.27
1000 characters:
0.013857s : 0.017603s
ratio = 1.0 : 1.27
10000 characters:
0.13426s : 0.151169s
ratio = 1.0 : 1.13
50000 characters:
0.709403s : 0.855136s
ratio = 1.0 : 1.21
100000 characters:
1.360735s : 1.674584s
ratio = 1.0 : 1.23
500000 characters:
6.754923s : 7.160508s
ratio = 1.0 : 1.06
1000000 characters:
11.232965s : 14.223914s
ratio = 1.0 : 1.27
Производительность первого метода лучше.