Мой сервер раньше видел APPARENT DEADLOCK в журналах.У меня есть несколько серверов, работающих за балансировщиком нагрузки, и интересно то, что я вижу, что DEADLOCK происходит на всех серверах одновременно (кто-нибудь знает, почему он влияет на все серверы)? .В течение этого периода времени запросы MySQL, которые обычно занимают 200 мс, занимают> 60 секунд.Вот как выглядели логи:
com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner: com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$DeadlockDetector@58780f76
-- APPARENT DEADLOCK!!! Complete Status:
Managed Threads: 3
Active Threads: 3
Active Tasks:
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@25ff87d4 (com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread-#0)
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@10ccf7ef (com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread-#1)
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@3305ec37 (com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread-#2)
Pending Tasks:
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@39cc9e5a
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@60d46f90
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@17509fea
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@b28bd63
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@56cbdc12
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@15a091b4
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@61ce325
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@48119520
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@4032fb7c
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@518eefff
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@30ea3b20
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@74960088
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@23a8fc7d
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@5ff0ee0
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@642d0644
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@207bc809
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@44d4936f
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@39a10d1b
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@3532334d
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@4bf79e62
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@2bd83398
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@1a202a2d
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@3eacda7f
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@495f5746
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@23f1f906
Итак, я пришел к переполнению стека и нашел ответ, который предложил Я установил statementCacheNumDeferredCloseThreads на 1.Я сделал это, и я вижу DEADLOCK менее часто и только на нескольких серверах за балансировщиком нагрузки вместо всех.
Журналы выглядят немного по-другому, но в период DEADLOCK запросы все еще очень длинные:
10 Oct 2018 06:33:32,037 [WARN] (Timer-0) com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner: com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$DeadlockDetector@4f39ad63 -- APPARENT DEADLOCK!!! Complete Status:
Managed Threads: 3
Active Threads: 3
Active Tasks:
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@34dee200 (com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread-#2)
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@3727ee6b (com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread-#1)
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask@4afb8b9 (com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread-#0)
Pending Tasks:
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@384a3b5b
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@7bc700b0
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@731bfd15
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@a88e9bf
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@63f18b56
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@20f0c518
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@caf7746
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@41a7a27d
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@2ee32a24
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@81df2e5
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@7f7fa1e7
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@337503f
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@34b2f877
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@53dfbede
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@512d5ddb
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@68a25969
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@4bf0754a
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@65770ba4
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@5e0f4154
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@249c22ed
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@6c8e5911
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@3179550f
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@15d8a795
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@50966489
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$1RefurbishCheckinResourceTask@4ecee95b
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StmtAcquireTask@35640ca0
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$AsyncTestIdleResourceTask@6550f196
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$AsyncTestIdleResourceTask@6816399
com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool$AsyncTestIdleResourceTask@3fbcd623
Pool thread stack traces:
Thread[com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread-#2,5,main]
com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.realClose(PreparedStatement.java:2765)
com.mysql.jdbc.StatementImpl.close(StatementImpl.java:541)
com.mchange.v1.db.sql.StatementUtils.attemptClose(StatementUtils.java:41)
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask.run(GooGooStatementCache.java:404)
com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread.run(ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner.java:547)
Thread[com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread-#1,5,main]
com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.realClose(PreparedStatement.java:2765)
com.mysql.jdbc.StatementImpl.close(StatementImpl.java:541)
com.mchange.v1.db.sql.StatementUtils.attemptClose(StatementUtils.java:41)
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask.run(GooGooStatementCache.java:404)
com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread.run(ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner.java:547)
Thread[com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread-#0,5,main]
com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.realClose(PreparedStatement.java:2765)
com.mysql.jdbc.StatementImpl.close(StatementImpl.java:541)
com.mchange.v1.db.sql.StatementUtils.attemptClose(StatementUtils.java:41)
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.stmt.GooGooStatementCache$1StatementCloseTask.run(GooGooStatementCache.java:404)
com.mchange.v2.async.ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner$PoolThread.run(ThreadPoolAsynchronousRunner.java:547)
Есть идеи, как это исправить?Я мог бы попытаться вообще отключить кэширование операторов, но меня беспокоит общее снижение производительности.Некоторые другие важные параметры:
minPoolSize = 30
maxPoolSize = 30
maxStatements = 100
unreturnedConnectionTimeout = 500
idleConnectionTestPeriod = 60
acquireIncrements = 3
C3p0 version = 0.9.1.2
Редактировать : Я забыл упомянуть, что во время этого улучшения, где я видел меньше взаимоблокировок, я также увеличил maxStatements, что может объяснить улучшение.Однако теперь я вижу только https://github.com/swaldman/c3p0/issues/53, в котором говорится, что version 0.9.2 вводит этот новый параметр statementCacheNumDeferredCloseThreads.Моя версия слишком старая.Я не получаю предупреждений / ошибок об этом параметре не существует.