Запрос узла - Неверный протокол - PullRequest
Новая
       60

Запрос узла - Неверный протокол

0 голосов
/ 24 апреля 2020

Я делаю запрос к github api следующим образом: 

exports.getPRDetails = (prLink) => {
return util.promisify(request)({
        url: url,
        headers: {
            Authorization: `token ${constants.config.githubToken}`,
            'User-Agent': 'my-agent'
        },
        json: true
    }).then(
        (response) => {
            if (response.statusCode !== 200) {
                console.log(`Request to ${url} got code ${response.statusCode} instead. ${response.body.message}`);
                if (response.body.errorMessages) {
                    console.log(response.body.errorMessages);
                }

                return;
            }

            const prDetail = {
                state: response.body.state, 
                commitSha: response.body.merge_commit_sha,
                baseBranch: response.body.base.ref,
                repoName: response.body.base.repo.full_name,
                merged: response.body.merged};

            return prDetail;
    });
}

, и я так называю это 

 helpers.getPRDetails(prLink).then(prDetail => {
                    if (prDetail == null) {
                        main.addErrorMessage({id: `SPM-${issue.issueKey}`, description: fillTemplate(strings.JIRA_ERROR_RESOLVED_BUT_NO_PR_IN_DESCRIPTION, {prLink: prLink})});
                    }
                    else {
                        if (prDetail.state !== 'closed' || !prDetail.merged){
                            main.addErrorMessage({id: `SPM-${issue.issueKey}`, description: fillTemplate(strings.JIRA_ERROR_RESOLVED_BUT_NO_PR_UNMERGED, {prLink: prLink})}); 
                        }

                        if (constants.reposToCheck.includes(prDetail.repoName.toUpperCase())){
                            asyncCallsCount++;
                            helpers.checkIfBranchContainsCommit(prDetail.repoName, prDetail.commitSha, currentBranch, releaseBranch).then(containsCommit =>{
                                if (!containsCommit) {
                                    errorMessage = fillTemplate(strings.JIRA_ERROR_RESOLVED_BUT_COMMIT_NOT_FOUND_IN_BRANCH, {releaseBranch: currentBranch, commitSha: prDetail.commitSha, prLink: prLink});
                                    errorMessage += issue.resolvedTicketPRs.length > 1 ? fillTemplate(strings.JIRA_ERROR_RESOLVED_TICKET_HAS_MULTIPLE_PRS, {releaseBranch: currentBranch}) : '';
                                    main.addErrorMessage({id: `SPM-${issue.issueKey}`, description: errorMessage});
                                }
                                asyncCallsCount--;
                            })
                        }
                    }
                    asyncCallsCount--;
                });

Я замечаю, что получаю спецификацию c ошибка с трассировкой стека 

(node:98756) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Error: Invalid protocol: agan:
    at Request.init (/Users/myuser/myapp/node_modules/request/request.js:458:31)
    at new Request (/Users/myuser/myapp/node_modules/request/request.js:127:8)
    at request (/Users/myuser/myapp/node_modules/request/index.js:53:10)
    at request (internal/util.js:235:26)
    at Object.exports.getPRDetails (/Users/myuser/myapp/helpers.js:22:35)
    at issue.resolvedTicketPRs.forEach (/Users/myuser/myapp/checks.js:38:25)
    at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
    at checkResolvedTickets (/Users/myuser/myapp/checks.js:36:37)
    at <anonymous>
(node:98756) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection. This error originated either by throwing inside of an async function without a catch block, or by rejecting a promise which was not handled with .catch(). (rejection id: 2)
(node:98756) [DEP0018] DeprecationWarning: Unhandled promise rejections are deprecated. In the future, promise rejections that are not handled will terminate the Node.js process with a non-zero exit code.

Я не уверен, каким должен быть этот протокол agan или откуда он взялся. Я знаю, что этот код работал в прошлом, поэтому не уверен, откуда эта ошибка.

Использование request@2.88.0 и util@0.10.3

...