В итоге я воспользовался советом WMI и @Hans, чтобы проверить, какие последовательные порты новые / отсутствуют.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Diagnostics.Contracts;
using System.IO.Ports;
using System.Management;
public static class SerialPortService
{
private static SerialPort _serialPort;
private static string[] _serialPorts;
private static ManagementEventWatcher arrival;
private static ManagementEventWatcher removal;
static SerialPortService()
{
_serialPorts = GetAvailableSerialPorts();
MonitorDeviceChanges();
}
/// <summary>
/// If this method isn't called, an InvalidComObjectException will be thrown (like below):
/// System.Runtime.InteropServices.InvalidComObjectException was unhandled
///Message=COM object that has been separated from its underlying RCW cannot be used.
///Source=mscorlib
///StackTrace:
/// at System.StubHelpers.StubHelpers.StubRegisterRCW(Object pThis, IntPtr pThread)
/// at System.Management.IWbemServices.CancelAsyncCall_(IWbemObjectSink pSink)
/// at System.Management.SinkForEventQuery.Cancel()
/// at System.Management.ManagementEventWatcher.Stop()
/// at System.Management.ManagementEventWatcher.Finalize()
///InnerException:
/// </summary>
public static void CleanUp()
{
arrival.Stop();
removal.Stop();
}
public static event EventHandler<PortsChangedArgs> PortsChanged;
private static void MonitorDeviceChanges()
{
try
{
var deviceArrivalQuery = new WqlEventQuery("SELECT * FROM Win32_DeviceChangeEvent WHERE EventType = 2");
var deviceRemovalQuery = new WqlEventQuery("SELECT * FROM Win32_DeviceChangeEvent WHERE EventType = 3");
arrival = new ManagementEventWatcher(deviceArrivalQuery);
removal = new ManagementEventWatcher(deviceRemovalQuery);
arrival.EventArrived += (o, args) => RaisePortsChangedIfNecessary(EventType.Insertion);
removal.EventArrived += (sender, eventArgs) => RaisePortsChangedIfNecessary(EventType.Removal);
// Start listening for events
arrival.Start();
removal.Start();
}
catch (ManagementException err)
{
}
}
private static void RaisePortsChangedIfNecessary(EventType eventType)
{
lock (_serialPorts)
{
var availableSerialPorts = GetAvailableSerialPorts();
if (!_serialPorts.SequenceEqual(availableSerialPorts))
{
_serialPorts = availableSerialPorts;
PortsChanged.Raise(null, new PortsChangedArgs(eventType, _serialPorts));
}
}
}
public static string[] GetAvailableSerialPorts()
{
return SerialPort.GetPortNames();
}
}
public enum EventType
{
Insertion,
Removal,
}
public class PortsChangedArgs : EventArgs
{
private readonly EventType _eventType;
private readonly string[] _serialPorts;
public PortsChangedArgs(EventType eventType, string[] serialPorts)
{
_eventType = eventType;
_serialPorts = serialPorts;
}
public string[] SerialPorts
{
get
{
return _serialPorts;
}
}
public EventType EventType
{
get
{
return _eventType;
}
}
}
Метод MonitorDeviceChanges фактически видит все изменения устройства (например, Диспетчер устройств), но проверка последовательных портов позволяет нам вызывать событие только после их изменения.
Чтобы использовать код, просто подпишитесь на событие PortsChanged, например, SerialPortService.PortsChanged += (sender1, changedArgs) => DoSomethingSerial(changedArgs.SerialPorts);
О, а метод .Raise - это просто метод расширения, который я где-то подобрал:
/// <summary>
/// Tell subscribers, if any, that this event has been raised.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="handler">The generic event handler</param>
/// <param name="sender">this or null, usually</param>
/// <param name="args">Whatever you want sent</param>
public static void Raise<T>(this EventHandler<T> handler, object sender, T args) where T : EventArgs
{
// Copy to temp var to be thread-safe (taken from C# 3.0 Cookbook - don't know if it's true)
EventHandler<T> copy = handler;
if (copy != null)
{
copy(sender, args);
}
}